Sorting Lumber By Grade Prior To Rough Mill Processing

Research Brief #5
Louisiana Forest Products Laboratory
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA


Research Objective

Develop and demonstrate a procedure to determine the benefits of sorting lumber by grade prior to rough mill processing.

Synopsis of Results

A computer program and procedure was developed to determine yield, processing time, and machine utilization differences between processing unsorted and sorted by grade lumber in both crosscut-first and rip-first rough mill systems.

Crosscut-First Case Study

Rip-First Case Study

Conclusions

Simulation software can be employed to determine the benefits of sorting lumber prior to rough mill processing. Simulation of each specific rough mill situation is required to determine these benefits because differences in rough mill variables will influence the results. The examples given here, however, showed rough mill sorting to have influence on rough mill yields, processing times and percentage machine utilization.

Researchers

Rado Gazo, Post-Doctoral Researcher
Louisiana Forest Products Laboratory
LSU Agricultural Center

Philip H. Steele, Professor
Mississippi Forest Products Laboratory

Target Group

Secondary wood manufacturers

Methodology

Rough mill yield, throughput, processing time and machine utilization can be determined by simulating the material flow in the rough mill. The RAM (Rough Mill Analysis Model) is a processoriented simulation software. The user describes the rough mill operation, and RAM then simulates the flow of the specified lumber grade mix through the model rough mill in real time. The lumber can be processed as either sorted by grade or unsorted. Boards for the simulation are randomly sampled from a digitized database of lumber.

Existing crosscut-first and rip-first rough mills were simulated using computer program RAM to provide the comparisons of yield and processing times of sorted versus unsorted lumber.

For both the simulated crosscut-first and rip-first rough mill systems, six identical cutting orders were filled for both sorted and unsorted lumber. The grade mix was specified to contain onethird of each of the grades of Firsts and Seconds, No. 1 Common, and No 2A Common.

Rough mill type, processing method, and cutting order were the factors analyzed in a three-factor completely randomized, balanced experimental design.


[Return to the list of Research Briefs]

[Return to the LFPL Home Page]

[Return to the LSU Home Page]


This page was last updated: 29-MAR-95, by: James Babin <jbabin1@tiger.lsu.edu>