|
RESEARCH INTERESTS
Wildlife Crop Depredation
http://www.agriculture.purdue.edu/fnr/cropdamage/
Agricultural damage by wildlife species is substantial and widespread
and has been estimated to cost agricultural producers over 4.5 billion
dollars annually in the United States. A 1993 and 1994 research survey
indicated that 80 percent of farmers and ranchers suffered wildlife damage
in the prior year, and 53 percent suffered damage that exceeded their
tolerance, which in turn, affected their willingness to manage for wildlife.
Negative perceptions related to crop depredation by vertebrates are likely
the fundamental causes of most conflicts arising between agricultural
and wildlife interests. The development of viable solutions to such conflicts
is the primary means to a more productive and sustainable coexistence
between agriculture and wildlife in human-dominated landscapes.
We surveyed crop depredation
by wildlife species across a 450-square mile portion of northern Indiana
and have quantified wildlife damage occurring in corn (100) and soybean
(60) fields from planting until harvest using multiple transect surveys
throughout the growing season. We collected extensive telemetry data
on target species including white-tailed deer, raccoons, and wild turkey
to determine spatially explicit movement data for these species within
the same landscape, specifically surveying crop damage.
Indiana DNR district biologists
are using the materials to help them deal with crop damage complaints
from farmers in their districts. These materials were distributed to
state deer and turkey biologists in the Midwest to assist biologists
in those states deal with crop damage complaints.
The
research indicates that landowners underestimated the number of damaged
fields and overestimated the value of crops lost due to wildlife
damage in terms of dollars lost rather than percent of total crop lost.
Farmers believed that deer caused the most damage to corn when most of
the damage was caused by raccoon. Misidentification of wildlife damage
to crops leads to negative feelings towards that species, which in turn
leads to unnecessary and unwarranted damage management practices resulting
in a loss of time and money by the farmer. Accurate assessments are important
because research shows that those experiencing damage may be less likely
to appropriately manage for wildlife on their property.
Sustaing Hardwood
Ecosystems
Forest management in the eastern United States is faced with many
modern challenges. Professional foresters have an innovative set
of management options for the maintenance of healthy forest ecosystems.
But some options raise public objections when applied to public lands
(e.g., types of timber harvest, prescribed fire) while the effects
of other management options on forests and their native inhabitants
are poorly understood. In addition, forest lands in the eastern and
Midwestern United States are primarily found in private ownership
and in small parcels. Such lands often do not have any active management
plans, and haphazard land-use often degrades the forest habitats
over time. As populations of forest organisms decline, restrictions
on landowners may increase because species become classified as endangered
or threatened (such as the Indiana bat), while increasing populations
of other species (white-tailed deer, invasive plants) may provide
other challenges. These problems are compounded by the lack of scientifically
rigorous research on the overall impacts of forest management options
on the affected ecosystems and their components. Without this research,
land managers are often unable to convince a skeptical public as
to the value of proposed management strategies.
- Many forestland management
strategies call for the conservation of biological diversity while
maintaining sustainable production of forest
products. Forest managers require information on how to incorporate
landscape considerations for biodiversity into forest management.
They also have undergone increasing demands to demonstrate the impacts
of forest management practices on the sustainability of
local flora and fauna. However, data to achieve these goals is lacking,
especially in regards to declining species.
In 2006, we initiated a study
on Crane NWSC in southern Indiana to 1.) determine breeding season habitat
use and structure by drumming ruffed grouse and
woodcock
singing
grounds and 2.) assess the impact of size, age, structure, and juxtaposition
of timber harvesting treatments as it relates to spatial distribution
of drumming male ruffed
grouse and woodcock singing grounds.
- The specific goals
of the Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment are diverse,
since the information will be of use to a broad array of potential
users. The research
objectives
include efforts to:
- Develop a proven system
of forest management prescriptions to maintain desired populations
of native plant and animal species, such as the encouragement of
oak regeneration
- Understand the response
of targeted native wildlife and plant species to forest management,
in
order to mitigate
the potential
negative effects
on species of conservation concern
- Assess
the public attitude towards forest management to develop new
approaches for
education of the general
public
and private
landowners; and to engage public
interest groups in a discussion of proper land
management
- Estimate the impacts
of forest management on aquatic systems to ensure that
such management protects the
quantity and
quality of
water used for human consumption
and healthy ecosystems.
To reach these goals and
objectives, we initiated a long-term, scientifically valid field
study on forest management and its impacts in the Morgan-Monroe and
Yellowwood State Forests. This is a collaboration among many public
land management agencies and universities. Zack Walker, IDNR State Herpetologist,
and Project Investigators for the box turtle and timber rattlesnake
portions of the project.
Box Turtles
Recent research indicates that previously unnoticed declines in box
turtle populations have become apparent across the country. What
were often regarded as ‘good numbers’ in box turtle density,
have been determined to be insufficient for healthy population growth
and survival. Although Indiana does have a few healthy populations,
these populations are widely scattered. Timber harvesting is a major
land use activity throughout the range of this forest species that
could impact turtle populations.
Our research is designed to evaluate the responses of box turtle home
range and habitat use to even- and uneven-aged timber harvesting. Beginning
in May 2007, we located box turtles in 6 research core areas (2 control,
2 uneven-age, 2 even-age) and subsequently tracked individuals 2-3
times per week through October 2007. Vegetation characteristics collected
at a subset of turtle locations will be used to assess box turtle habitat
use and selection.
Relatively high population densities of box turtles are required for
successful reproduction. In 2007, we established two, 20-acre search
plots within the each core area. Plots were searched for turtles 6
times to estimate local population densities within each plot. All
data collected in 2007 and part of 2008 will serve as the baseline
to compare to post-harvest responses.
Timber Rattlesnakes
Timber rattlesnakes have experienced population declines throughout
most of their range. These population declines have been attributed
to habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, and human persecution. Within
Indiana, timber rattlesnakes have been listed as endangered due to
extensive population declines. Although previous work has been preformed
on the spatial ecology of this species within Brown County, no information
exists on the effects of timber harvesting. This study will attempt
to quantify the effects of timber management practices on rattlesnake
movement patterns and habitat selection.
Beginning in May of 2007, surveys for timber rattlesnakes were preformed
within core units where previous observations occurred. Nineteen snakes
were observed as part of these surveys. A subset of captured rattlesnakes
(6M:5F) were implanted with a radio transmitter and tracked 3 times
a week throughout their active season. Radioed snakes are currently
located on control and even-aged management units. All snakes were
tracked to their respective hibernacula. The habitat selected by study
individuals was quantified and will be compared to paired random habitat
measurements. Data collected from 2007 will be used for comparison
against post harvest snake radiolocations and habitat selection.
RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS (Peer Reviewed)
- DeVault, T. L., J. C. Beasley, L. A. Humberg, B. J. MacGowan,
M. I. Retamosa and O. E. Rhodes, Jr. 2007. Intrafield
patterns of wildlife damage to corn and soybeans in northern Indiana. Human Wildlife Conflicts
1(2):205-213.
- Williams, R. N. and B.
J. MacGowan. 2004. Natural history
data on the mole salamander in Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of
Science 113(2):147-150.
- Williams, R. N. and B.
J. MacGowan. 2004. Mole Salamander (Ambystoma talpoidia). Herpetological
Review 35(3):279.
PUBLISHED PROCEEDINGS
and SYMPOSIA (Non-Peer Reviewed)
- DeVault, T. L., B. J. MacGowan, J. C. Beasley, L. A. Humberg,
M. I. Retamosa and O. E. Rhodes, Jr. 2007. Evaluation of corn and soybean
damage by wildlife in northern Indiana. Proceedings of the 12th Wildlife
Damage Management Conference, April 9-12, 2007, Corpus Christi, Texas.
- MacGowan,
B.J. 2006. Hunting Lease Enterprises for Private Landowners – Goldmine
or Minefield? Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters
2005 Annual Convention, T. Clark, ed., Fort Worth, Texas.
- Humberg,
L. A., T. L. DeVault, B. J. MacGowan, J. C. Beasley, and
O. E. Rhodes, Jr. 2006. Wildlife crop depredation in northcentral
Indiana. Proceedings of the Ninth National Wild Turkey Symposium,
A. Stewart,
ed., Grand Rapids, Michigan.
- MacGowan, B.J., L. Severied,
and F. Skemp, Jr. 2004. Control of deer damage with chemical repellents
in regenerating hardwood
stands, La
Crosse, Wisconsin, USA. Pgs. 127-133 in C.H. Michler, P.M. Pijut,
J. Van Sambeek,
M. Coggeshall, J. Seifert, K. Woeste, and R. Overton (eds.).
Black walnut in a new century, proceedings of the 6th Walnut
Council research
symposium,
2004 July 25-28; Lafayette, IN. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-243. St.
Paul,
MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central
Research
Station. 188 p.
| |
| |