Graphic. AgriculturesAgriculturesGraphic. Purdue University.Agricultures
Clouds

Features

Pollution-busters

Scientific sleuths

Living and learning abroad

Breaking barriers

Business boom

Spotlight

Boning up on biotech

Taking the top spot

DTS-a home grown fraternity

Progress report

4-H lends a helping hand

A winning combination

Columns

Fostering an environment that embrarces diversity

Dean's Message

The New Face of 4-H

Feature   |   Fall 2003

Scientific sleuths

Getting the dirt on a tree thief

 

By Michelle Betz

Entomology isn’t the only agricultural discipline that helps solve crimes. Soil properties are now making their mark in the world of forensic science. Law enforcement professionals around the country are finding this evidence to be key in closing cases.

Brad Lee, now an assistant professor in agronomy, tapped his knowledge of soil properties to help solve a case of stolen palm trees. While working on his doctorate at the University of California-Riverside, Lee and his colleagues at the Soil Mineralogy Laboratory were asked to lend their expertise with mineral and physical characteristics of the soil in a police investigation.

“It was a new application of fundamental soil mineralogical and morphological techniques,” Lee says. While soil properties are commonly examined in agriculture and other areas, such as septic system placement, this was Lee’s first time using these basic elements in a criminal investigation.

Scientists at the lab were contacted in April 1997 by the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office, which was investigating the theft of rare palm trees. Lee didn’t hesitate at the chance to become the Sherlock Holmes of soil. “My first reaction was to quickly say ‘yes,’” he says. “The process was a simple application of scientific method.”

The soil scientist turned sleuth was taken to the suspected thief’s home located in a modest subdivision. Lee became suspicious as soon as he arrived. “It looked a little odd as several palm trees were planted in the small lot," he says. “These were rare, expensive trees grown by an exclusive nursery and unlikely to be found in the average subdivision.”

This circumstantial evidence helped the scientists locate 33 palm trees believed to belong to the nursery from which the palms were stolen. Soil samples taken from the root balls were tested to see if there were similarities between the soil in the root balls and the distinctive potting soil that was used by the nursery. Lee used these tests to examine soil color, particle size, mineral density and heavy mineral grain counts.

Lee and his colleagues found that the grains in 25 of the root balls were consistent with the mineral makeup of the nursery’s potting mix. This meant that at least 25 of the 33 palm trees found at the residence were stolen from the nursery. This evidence sealed the deal and was enough to convict the criminal.

“The circumstantial evidence was overwhelming; however, the prosecution lacked a tangible link to the victim’s palm trees until the soil investigation was completed,” Lee says. Case closed.

 

© 2003 Purdue University School of Agriculture

 

 

 

Link. Purdue University. Link. Agricultures magazine.