|
This page describes the procedures that faculty and staff must
follow to publish and receive credit for numbered Purdue Extension
educational materials.
The procedures outlined below are intended to ensure that all
Purdue Extension materials receive the same review and are treated
with the same level of importance.
The originating department is responsible for ensuring review
of all educational materials. The review process for Web-only
publications should be no different and no less rigorous than
that established for more traditional, ink-on-paper publications.
The names of two reviewers are required (three are preferred)
on the ACS Form 1.
Extension Program Leaders are ultimately responsible for the
quality of all Purdue Extension materials and for ensuring that
all materials make appropriate contributions to their respective
programs. By signing the ACS Form 1,
Program Leaders signify their approval of those materials.
All numbered Purdue Extension materials will include the “Expert
Reviewed” mark. This mark has been created to distinguish
for readers that Purdue Extension materials are science-based
and peer reviewed. |
